Student-Centered Learning Practices in English Language Teaching under the Merdeka Curriculum Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52760/jadila.v6i3.854Keywords:
Student-centered learning, Merdeka Curriculum, Pre-service Teachers, English Language Teaching, Qualitative Case StudyAbstract
The Merdeka Curriculum promotes student autonomy and competency development through Student-Centered Learning (SCL) implementation. As future educators, pre-service teachers are expected to design and facilitate active, meaningful, and independent learning experiences. However, translating SCL theory into classroom practice remains challenging, particularly during teaching internships. This study aims to analyze the implementation of SCL by pre-service English teachers within the Merdeka Curriculum framework during their apprenticeship program. A qualitative case study design was employed involving three pre-service teachers who completed teaching internships at senior high schools. Data were collected through classroom video observations and document analysis of lesson modules prepared by the participants. The analysis focused on the implementation of nine SCL characteristics—active, constructive, collaborative, enthusiastic, dialogical, contextual, reflective, multisensory, and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)—as well as the application of six SCL-related learning models: Cooperative Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, Contextual Teaching and Learning, Discovery Learning, and Blended Learning. The results reveal that all participants successfully incorporated SCL principles into both their lesson modules and classroom practices. However, variations were identified in the selection of learning models and the extent to which SCL characteristics were integrated into teaching. Some pre-service teachers demonstrated stronger implementation of collaborative and reflective learning than others, indicating differing levels of pedagogical competence. These results suggest that while pre-service teachers possess a foundational understanding of SCL, consistent and effective implementation requires continuous guidance, practical training, and reflective mentoring.
Downloads
References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Azizah, M. N. (2011). Efektivitas penggunaan metode pembelajaran student-centered learning berbasis classroom blogging untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa SMA[The effectiveness of using student-centered learning based on classroom blogging to increase students’ achievement]. httpl://repositery.upi.edu
Darmayanti, P. S. (2023). Empowering student-centered learning in English education (A Closer Look at Kurikulum Merdeka). AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 4(1), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v4i1.3694
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie A. H., Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 year of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Khoiron, A. M., & Sutadji, E. (2015). Kontribusi implementasi pendidikan karakter dan lingkungan sekolah terhadap berpikir kreatif serta dampaknya pada kompetensi kejuruan[Contribution of implementation character education and school environment on creative thinking and its effect on vocational competence]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang, 22(2), 103-116.
Kurniawan, R., Abu Bakar, M. Y., & Fuad, Ah. Z. (2023). Teacher’s Perspective on Student Center Learning Paradigm in Inclusive Madrasa. TA’DIBUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/jpai.6.1.1-9
Lestari, I. (2023). The English Teacher’s Perspective and Challenge on Implementing Merdeka Curriculum. In RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa (Vol. 9, Issue 3). https://pusatinformasi.guru.kemdikbud.go.id,
MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., Karp, G.G. (2013). Preparing physical education preservice teachers to design instructionally aligned lessons through constructivist pedagogical practices, Teaching and Teacher Education. 33. 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.008
Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804394
Puspitasari, I. (2021). Model Student Center Learning dan Teacher Center Learning. In A. Munandar (Ed.), Sistem Student Center Learning Dan Teacher Center Learning (Pp. 25–45). Media Sains Indonesia.
Ramasamy, S. A., & Zainal, A. Z. (2023). Facilitating the Construction of Knowledge Collectively Through Dialogic Discourse: Teachers' Perspectives and Practices in English Language Teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/79-96
Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2018). Effects of active learning environments supported with self- and peer assessment on pre-service teachers' pedagogical and self-efficacy beliefs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(5), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2017.1355049
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
Sybing, R. (2021). Examining dialogic opportunities in teacher-student interaction: An ethnographic observation of the language classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100492
Ugwu, C. N., & Val, E. (2023). Qualitative Research. IDOSR Journal of Computer and Applied Sciences, 8(1), 20–35. www.idosr.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leni Nur’aeni, Natalia Anggrarini, Atikah Wati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








_1.png)



